Recent chats
ASKGEEZ Q&A GUIDEWriting & communication

How can I avoid dialogue that explains facts both speakers already know?

Quick answer

When a line tells another character something they already know, ask what the speaker needs from them right now. If the answer is only “the reader needs to know,” move the fact into a brief narrative cue or give the speaker a reason to bring it up, such as challenging a decision or correcting a misunderstanding. Keep information that changes the exchange; let the rest emerge when it matters.

LET’S WORK THROUGH IT

The question, the details, the next step.

Question

I have a scene where two sisters discuss their family bakery. One says, “As you know, Dad left us the bakery when he died, and the bank loan is due Friday.” It feels like she’s talking to the reader. How do I diagnose what’s wrong?

Geez

Try the “why this, why now?” test. The sentence contains background—the inheritance and the loan deadline—but what does the speaker want from her sister in this moment? If she wants help, is pressing her to act, or is blaming her for delaying, the deadline can serve an immediate purpose. If the sentence exists only to brief the reader, it will probably feel staged.

Also ask what the listener already knows. A fact can matter to the reader and still be old news to both characters. Mark explanatory lines with two notes: “reader needs this” and “speaker needs this.” When only the first applies, revise the line or move the information elsewhere.

Follow-up question

How could I rewrite it without making the sisters explain the inheritance to each other?

Geez

Choose the speaker’s immediate tactic. Suppose the older sister wants her sibling to sign a sale agreement, while the younger one wants to keep the bakery. The deadline can now be leverage rather than a fact recited for the audience:

“Sign it tonight,” Mara said, sliding the agreement across the counter.

Nina left it where it was. “Dad didn’t leave us this place so we could sell it in a panic.”

“The bank isn’t waiting for us to agree about what Dad wanted.”

The exchange doesn’t explain the inheritance. It gives the deadline a job: it sharpens their disagreement. If the inheritance matters later, establish it briefly when it becomes relevant—for example, through a concise narrative cue. Keep only details the story needs.

Follow-up question

What if the characters aren’t arguing? I need to include a fact, but there’s no obvious conflict.

Geez

Conflict doesn’t have to mean a fight. A character can mention a familiar fact because it affects a decision, changes a plan, or corrects a mistaken assumption. One sister might say, “The delivery truck comes at noon, so we can’t block the back door,” while they arrange the kitchen. The schedule matters to their task.

If the fact changes nothing in the scene, consider delaying it. If it matters but needn’t be spoken, let an action or short narrative cue carry it. For example, a character could move boxes away from the entrance, while the narration supplies the delivery time if readers need it. Don’t make characters state a shared fact just to ensure the audience hears it.

Follow-up question

Can you give me a quick revision process and a prompt I can use on my own scene?

Geez

Read the scene for what each person wants, then underline lines that explain background or shared history. For each line, ask: Does the listener know this? Why bring it up now? What changes if it disappears? Keep, reshape, relocate, or cut it based on your answers.

Try this prompt:

“Review this dialogue for lines where a character tells another character something they already know. For each line, identify what the reader needs, what the speaker wants in that moment, and whether the fact changes the exchange. Suggest a revision that gives the fact a present purpose through a decision, correction, pressure, or practical constraint. If it has no natural purpose in dialogue, suggest a concise narrative cue or recommend delaying or removing it. Preserve distinct voices. Don’t add backstory that isn’t in the scene; label assumptions.”

Read the revision aloud. If a line still sounds aimed at an audience rather than the other character, give the speaker a more specific tactic—or move the information out of the dialogue.

A practical checklist

  • Underline dialogue that explains background or shared history.

  • Note what the speaker wants from the listener right now.

  • Check whether the listener already knows the fact.

  • Keep the fact in dialogue if it affects a decision, correction, plan, or pressure point.

  • Move useful but unspoken information into a brief narrative cue, or delay it.

  • Read the exchange aloud and revise lines that sound aimed at the audience.

A few more useful answers

Is it always wrong for characters to repeat information they both know?

No. Repetition can feel natural when the fact is challenged, used to persuade, or newly important. Ask whether the speaker has a reason to bring it up now.

How can I tell whether to cut a fact or move it into narration?

Ask whether readers need it to understand this scene or a later choice. If they do, a short narrative cue may be clearer; if not, cut it or wait until it matters.

What if a character would realistically explain the fact anyway?

Give the explanation a specific audience within the story, such as a newcomer who genuinely doesn’t know. Otherwise, let the character refer to the fact briefly while pursuing an immediate goal.

YOUR QUESTION. YOUR DETAILS.

Let’s work through your situation.

Get a tailored answer or help with your next task. Starts at $1, with a quote before you pay.

Ask your own question
← Back to Geez at Work