Recent chats
ASKGEEZ Q&A GUIDEWriting & communication

How do I explain which devices or browsers a product supports?

Quick answer

State the product area, the devices or browsers checked, and the specific features or tasks covered. Use a compact, feature-by-browser or feature-by-device list when support differs. Connect each claim to an identifiable, dated record where available. Avoid blanket phrases such as “works on all devices.” If records do not establish support for a browser, version, or task, label it unverified rather than implying support.

LET’S WORK THROUGH IT

The question, the details, the next step.

Question

I need to explain browser and device support on a product page. What should the statement contain?

Geez

First define what “support” means in this statement. Name the product area, feature, or task, then list only the browsers or devices your records cover. Include version or operating-system details only when the records establish them. Add a check date when one is recorded, and include a contact route only if your organization provides one.

Avoid a broad sentence such as “Our product works on every browser.” It could imply that every feature works on every device and version, even when the evidence is narrower. MDN’s compatibility-table guidance concerns shared web technologies, not any particular commercial product. Its useful principle is to tie compatibility information to the relevant feature and browser rather than generalize about an entire product. [S1]

Follow-up question

Some features have different support. Is a short list enough, or should I use a table?

Geez

When support differs, organize the information by feature or task and browser or device. That helps readers find the combination they care about without assuming that one feature’s support applies to everything. MDN describes browser compatibility tables for web-platform features as using data keyed to the specific feature; this is a useful model for scoped presentation, not evidence about your own product. [S1]

Here is a worksheet example, not a claim about a real product. In a document or content system, keep each entry together as a row or clearly separated item:

  • Feature or task: [Feature A]
  • Browser/device and version: [Exact combination checked]
  • Result: [Verified result, known limitation, or not checked]
  • Source-verification field: [Record title or identifier; what it covers; date checked]

Repeat those fields for each feature and combination. Do not leave a blank result that readers might mistake for approval. Use labels such as “verified” or “known limitation” only when the records support them; if there is no relevant record, say “not verified.”

Follow-up question

Our notes mention Baseline for web features. Can I use that as proof that the whole product is compatible?

Geez

No. Baseline summarizes support for web-platform features across its defined set of desktop and mobile browsers. It distinguishes widely available, newly available, and limited-availability features. Newly available features may not work in older browsers or devices. Baseline also does not establish accessibility, usability, performance, security, or complete compatibility outside its browser set. [S2]

If you mention Baseline, name the particular web feature and the status established by your source. Keep that distinct from evidence about your product’s behavior. For example: “The [feature] has [verified status] according to [record]. Product support for [task] was checked separately on [browser/device and version] on [date].” Fill in those fields only from records you can inspect. If the product task has not been verified, say so rather than using a platform summary as a substitute.

Follow-up question

Can you give me copyable wording that makes the evidence trail visible, including when we do not know the answer?

Geez

Use this block as a starting point. Replace placeholders only with confirmed information, and keep the source-verification field in your working worksheet:

Compatibility for [product area or task]

  • Verified browsers/devices: [Exact names and versions checked]
  • What was checked: [Features or tasks covered]
  • Known limitations: [Confirmed limitations, or “Not established by the records reviewed”]
  • Not verified: [Browsers, devices, versions, or tasks not checked]
  • Last checked: [Date, if recorded]
  • Source-verification field: [Record title or identifier; scope; date checked; responsible person or team, if recorded]

Before publishing, compare every public claim with the record named in the verification field. Evidence for one browser, version, or feature does not establish support for other combinations. If a record is missing or unclear, leave the claim out or label it unverified. Compatibility for a particular product must come from product-specific records.

A practical checklist

  • Define the exact product feature, area, or task the statement covers.

  • List only browsers, devices, versions, and operating systems supported by identifiable records.

  • Group entries by feature and browser or device when support varies.

  • Mark gaps as not verified; do not imply support through blank fields or broad platform labels.

  • Complete the source-verification field with the record, its scope, and the check date when available.

  • Remove any wording that claims more than the records establish.

A few more useful answers

Should I include a browser version?

Include it when the underlying record identifies that version. If the record names only a browser or a broader range, do not invent a more precise version claim.

What if support records are missing or unclear?

Do not present the combination as supported. Mark it unverified in your working copy and seek an appropriate product record before making a public claim.

Does a web-platform compatibility label prove the product has been tested?

No. A platform compatibility summary describes a web feature within its stated scope, not a particular product’s behavior. Product-specific support needs product-specific evidence. [S2]

Sources

References used for this guide.

  1. [S1] MDN guidance on browser compatibility tables and data
    developer.mozilla.org · Checked
  2. [S2] MDN definition of Baseline browser compatibility
    developer.mozilla.org · Checked

YOUR QUESTION. YOUR DETAILS.

Let’s work through your situation.

Get a tailored answer or help with your next task. Starts at $1, with a quote before you pay.

Ask your own question
← Back to Geez at Work